Portrait of Walter Benjamin. Photo by Ullstein Bild / Getty. |
Benjamin's point on the contemplation of art feels reminiscent of today's mass digitization and dissemination of content (what could be considered "art"), in that television and social media have effectively sedated our ability to critically think. The 24-hour news cycle and apps like TikTok are good examples of this phenomenon. Furthermore, Davis references another art theorist's (Frederick Jameson) comparison between video and traditional art, who claims that video is incapable of fostering communication (381). These ideas are heavily interwoven with each other, but fall short of the reality of how society and people consume art.
Letterboxd is a popular social networking platform for those that wish to discuss film and share their opinions. Image retrieved from Letterboxd | About brand. |
Early 20th century camera. Retrieved from Collectors Weekly. |
Film and photography, and by extension any mode for the production of art, can all foster insightful communication between people. Benjamin's evidence for the replacement of thought, that the mere change between frames prevents and disrupts contemplation (section XIV), severely underestimates the human mind's capability to produce complex thought instantaneously, and also ignores that contemplation can occur post-viewing.
The notion that film does not foster communication is purely
a conservative reaction to the democratization of art, and it desperately tries
to cling onto the idea that the value of art is derived from the traditional
exclusivity of it. At the end of the day, art has intrinsic value because there
was a person to create it, no matter the medium. Thus, contemporarily, the most
significant discussion regarding society and art is how we analyze, discuss,
and perceive artworks produced by artificial intelligence, and whether it
impacts our current perceptions of human-made art.
Benjamin, Walter. "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, 1936." 1935.
Davis, Douglas. "The Work of Art in the Age of Digital Reproduction: An Evolving Thesis: 1991
1995." Leonardo 28.5 (1995): 381-386.
jmanwarren. Photograph of an early-twentieth century camera. 2020. Collectors Weekly.
Collectorsweekly.com, https://www.collectorsweekly.com/stories/287327-vintage-early-20th-
Letterboxd. Horizontal layout of Letterboxd logo. 2011.
Letterboxd.com, https://letterboxd.com/about/brand/. Accessed 20 April 2023.
OpenAI. "Dall-E 2 Explained" OpenAI, 6 April 2022, https://www.youtube.com/watch
Ulstein Bild/Getty. Portrait photograph of Walter Benjamin in adulthood. The New Yorker.
Photograph. Newyorker.com, https://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/walter-benjamins
unfinished-magnum-opus-revisited-through-contemporary-art. Accessed 20 April 2023.
I agree that the way in which we interpret art created by AI is what truly determines the value of that piece. While I do think Benjamin provided a reasonable fear of how mass digitalization and advancement could have reduced our ability for thinking and authenticity, in reality, this mechanization has drastically improved the reach and innovation of many more different works of art, like you mentioned film, photography, and other produced art. Art truly is dependent on the creator and the viewer, and I agree that the way in which we process and perceive such works is what brings more value.
ReplyDelete